The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 354:241-250 January 19, 2006 Number 3
NextNext

Mucus Clearance and Lung Function in Cystic Fibrosis with Hypertonic Saline
Scott H. Donaldson, M.D., William D. Bennett, Ph.D., Kirby L. Zeman, Ph.D., Michael R. Knowles, M.D., Robert Tarran, Ph.D., and Richard C. Boucher, M.D.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-PDA Full Text
-PowerPoint Slide Set
-Supplementary Material

Commentary
-Editorial
 by Ratjen, F.
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited
-E-mail When Letters Appear

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Abnormal homeostasis of the volume of airway surface liquid in patients with cystic fibrosis is thought to produce defects in mucus clearance and airway defense. Through osmotic forces, hypertonic saline may increase the volume of airway surface liquid, restore mucus clearance, and improve lung function.

Methods A total of 24 patients with cystic fibrosis were randomly assigned to receive treatment with inhaled hypertonic saline (5 ml of 7 percent sodium chloride) four times daily with or without pretreatment with amiloride. Mucus clearance and lung function were measured during 14-day baseline and treatment periods.

Results Long-term inhalation of hypertonic saline without pretreatment with amiloride (i.e., with placebo pretreatment) resulted in a sustained (≥8 hours) increase in 1-hour rates of mucus clearance, as compared with those with amiloride pretreatment (14.0±2.0 vs. 7.0±1.5 percent, respectively; P=0.02) and increased 24-hour rates of mucus clearance over baseline. Furthermore, inhalation of hypertonic saline with placebo improved the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) between the baseline period and the treatment period (mean difference, 6.62 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.6 to 11.7; P=0.02), whereas hypertonic saline with amiloride did not improve FEV1 (mean difference, 2.9 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, –2.2 to 8.0; P=0.23). Forced vital capacity (FVC), the forced expiratory flow between 25 and 75 percent of FVC (FEF25–75), and respiratory symptoms also significantly improved in patients treated with hypertonic saline and placebo, whereas the residual volume as a proportion of total lung capacity (RV:TLC) did not change in either group. A comparison of the changes in lung function in the two groups showed no significant difference. In vitro data suggested that sustained hydration of airway surfaces was responsible for the sustained improvement in mucus clearance, whereas inhibition of osmotically driven water transport by amiloride accounted for the observed loss of clinical benefit.

Conclusions In patients with cystic fibrosis, inhalation of hypertonic saline produced a sustained acceleration of mucus clearance and improved lung function. This treatment may protect the lung from insults that reduce mucus clearance and produce lung disease.


Source Information

From the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Cystic Fibrosis Research and Treatment Center (S.H.D., W.D.B., M.R.K., R.T., R.C.B.) and the Center for Environmental Medicine, Asthma and Lung Biology (W.D.B., K.L.Z.) — both in Chapel Hill.

Drs. Donaldson and Bennett contributed equally to this article.

Address reprint requests to Dr. Donaldson at 6019 Thurston Bowles Bldg., CB# 7248, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Research and Treatment Center, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, or at scott_donaldson{at}med.unc.edu.

Full Text of this Article


Related Letters:

Hypertonic Saline for Cystic Fibrosis
Aziz I., Kastelik J. A., Zarogiannis S., Hatzoglou C., Gourgoulianis K., Kuver R., Lee S. P., Bye P. T.P., Elkins M. R., Donaldson S. H., Tarran R., Boucher R. C., Ratjen F.
Extract | Full Text | PDF  
N Engl J Med 2006; 354:1848-1851, Apr 27, 2006. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.