FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |   Search Term  Advanced Search

Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe

Previous Volume 355:1863-1872 November 2, 2006 Number 18 Next

	Full Text PDF PDA Full Text PowerPoint Slide Set Supplementary Material Letters Add to Personal Archive Add to Citation Manager Notify a Friend E-mail When Cited E-mail When Letters Appear PubMed Citation

ABSTRACT

Background Recommendations for colorectal-cancer screening are based solely on age and family history of cancer, not sex.

Methods We performed a cross-sectional analysis of the data from a large colonoscopy-based screening program that included 50,148 participants who were 40 to 66 years of age. People 40 to 49 years of age were eligible only if they had a family history of cancer of any type. Of the 43,042 participants 50 to 66 years of age, 13.3% reported a family history of colorectal cancer, as did 66.3% of the 7106 participants who were 40 to 49 years of age. We defined advanced neoplasia as cancer or adenoma that was at least 10 mm in diameter, had high-grade dysplasia, or had villous or tubulovillous histologic characteristics, or any combination thereof. We used multivariate logistic regression to identify associations between participants' characteristics and advanced neoplasia in a primary (or derivation) data set, and we confirmed the associations in a secondary (or validation) data set.

Results Advanced neoplasia was detected in 2553 (5.9%) participants 50 to 66 years of age and in 243 (3.4%) participants 40 to 49 years of age. The rate of complications during colonoscopy was 0.1%, and no participants died. In the validation set, a logistic-regression model showed that male sex was independently associated with advanced neoplasia (adjusted odds ratio, 1.73; 95% confidence interval, 1.52 to 1.98; P<0.001). In each age group (40 to 49 years, 50 to 54 years, 55 to 59 years, and 60 to 66 years), the number of persons who would have to undergo colorectal-cancer screening in order to detect one advanced neoplasia was significantly lower in men than in women (23 vs. 36, 17 vs. 28, 12 vs. 22, and 10 vs. 18, respectively).

Conclusions We detected advanced neoplasia at a significantly higher rate in men than in women, which may warrant refinement of the screening recommendations for colorectal cancer.

Source Information

From the Department of Gastroenterology, Medical Center for Postgraduate Education, and the Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology (J.R., M.R., M.P., J.P., J.O., E.B.); and the Departments of Biostatistics (E.K.) and Colorectal Cancer (M.P.N.), Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology — all in Warsaw, Poland.

Address reprint requests to Dr. Regula at the Department of Gastroenterology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center, Roentgen St. 5, 02-784 Warsaw, Poland, or at jregula{at}coi.waw.pl.

Full Text of this Article

Related Letters:

Colonoscopy Screening for Detection of Advanced Neoplasia
Latreille M. W., Anderson J. C., Maisonneuve P., Lowenfels A. B., Picca S. M., Regula J., Polkowski M., Butruk E.
Extract | Full Text | PDF  
N Engl J Med 2007; 356:632-634, Feb 8, 2007. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Levin, B., Lieberman, D. A., McFarland, B., Smith, R. A., Brooks, D., Andrews, K. S., Dash, C., Giardiello, F. M., Glick, S., Levin, T. R., Pickhardt, P., Rex, D. K., Thorson, A., Winawer, S. J., for the American Cancer Society Colorectal Cancer, (2008). Screening and Surveillance for the Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer and Adenomatous Polyps, 2008: A Joint Guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. CA Cancer J Clin 58: 130-160 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Rex, D. K., Imperiale, T. F., Regula, J., Polkowski, M., Glaser, D. S., Butterly, L. F., Pohl, H., Kim, D. H., Pickhardt, P. J. (2008). CT colonography versus colonoscopy for the detection of advanced neoplasia.. NEJM 358: 88-89 [Full Text]  
• Adler, A, Pohl, H, Papanikolaou, I S, Abou-Rebyeh, H, Schachschal, G, Veltzke-Schlieker, W, Khalifa, A C, Setka, E, Koch, M, Wiedenmann, B, Rosch, T (2008). A prospective randomised study on narrow-band imaging versus conventional colonoscopy for adenoma detection: does narrow-band imaging induce a learning effect?. Gut 57: 59-64 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Pickhardt, P. J., Hassan, C., Laghi, A., Zullo, A., Kim, D. H., Iafrate, F., Morini, S. (2008). Small and Diminutive Polyps Detected at Screening CT Colonography: A Decision Analysis for Referral to Colonoscopy. Am. J. Roentgenol. 190: 136-144 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Bujanda, L., Sarasqueta, C., Zubiaurre, L., Cosme, A., Munoz, C., Sanchez, A., Martin, C., Tito, L., Pinol, V., Castells, A., Llor, X., Xicola, R. M, Pons, E., Clofent, J., de Castro, M. L, Cuquerella, J., Medina, E., Gutierrez, A., Arenas, J. I, Jover, R., for the EPICOLON Group, (2007). Low adherence to colonoscopy in the screening of first-degree relatives of patients with colorectal cancer. Gut 56: 1714-1718 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Denis, B., Ruetsch, M., Strentz, P., Vogel, J. Y., Guth, F., Boyaval, J. M., Pagnon, X., Ebelin, J. F., Gendre, I., Perrin, P. (2007). Short term outcomes of the first round of a pilot colorectal cancer screening programme with guaiac based faecal occult blood test. Gut 56: 1579-1584 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Kim, D. H., Pickhardt, P. J., Taylor, A. J., Leung, W. K., Winter, T. C., Hinshaw, J. L., Gopal, D. V., Reichelderfer, M., Hsu, R. H., Pfau, P. R. (2007). CT Colonography versus Colonoscopy for the Detection of Advanced Neoplasia. NEJM 357: 1403-1412 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Ruthotto, F, Papendorf, F, Wegener, G, Unger, G, Dlugosch, B, Korangy, F, Manns, M., Greten, T. (2007). Participation in screening colonoscopy in first-degree relatives from patients with colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol 18: 1518-1522 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Otto, H. F. (2007). Colorectal Screening after Polypectomy. ANN INTERN MED 146: 820-820 [Full Text]  
• Amos-Landgraf, J. M., Kwong, L. N., Kendziorski, C. M., Reichelderfer, M., Torrealba, J., Weichert, J., Haag, J. D., Chen, K.-S., Waller, J. L., Gould, M. N., Dove, W. F. (2007). A target-selected Apc-mutant rat kindred enhances the modeling of familial human colon cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104: 4036-4041 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Imperiale, T. F. (2007). Quantitative Immunochemical Fecal Occult Blood Tests: Is It Time to Go Back to the Future?. ANN INTERN MED 146: 309-311 [Full Text]  
• Latreille, M. W., Anderson, J. C., Maisonneuve, P., Lowenfels, A. B., Picca, S. M., Regula, J., Polkowski, M., Butruk, E. (2007). Colonoscopy Screening for Detection of Advanced Neoplasia. NEJM 356: 632-634 [Full Text]  
• Levine, J. S., Ahnen, D. J. (2006). Adenomatous Polyps of the Colon. NEJM 355: 2551-2557 [Full Text]  
• (2006). Should Sex Be a Factor in Screening Guidelines for Colorectal Cancer?. JWatch Oncology and Hematology 2006: 3-3 [Full Text]  
• (2006). Differences in Colonoscopic Screening Proposed for Men vs. Women. JWatch Gastroenterology 2006: 4-4 [Full Text]