FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |   Search Term  Advanced Search

Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe

Previous Volume 355:2533-2541 December 14, 2006 Number 24 Next

	Full Text PDF PDA Full Text PowerPoint Slide Set Supplementary Material Editorial by Lieberman, D. Add to Personal Archive Add to Citation Manager Notify a Friend E-mail When Cited E-mail When Letters Appear

ABSTRACT

Background Colonoscopy is commonly used to screen for neoplasia. To assess the performance of screening colonoscopy in everyday practice, we conducted a study of the rates of detection of adenomas and the amount of time taken to withdraw the colonoscope among endoscopists in a large community-based practice.

Methods During a 15-month period, 12 experienced gastroenterologists performed 7882 colonoscopies, of which 2053 were screening examinations in subjects who had not previously undergone colonoscopy. We recorded the numbers, sizes, and histologic features of the neoplastic lesions detected during screening, as well as the duration of insertion and of withdrawal of the colonoscope during the procedure. We compared rates of detection of neoplastic lesions among gastroenterologists who had mean colonoscopic withdrawal times of less than 6 minutes with the rates of those who had mean withdrawal times of 6 minutes or more. According to experts, 6 minutes is the minimum length of time to allow adequate inspection during instrument withdrawal.

Results Neoplastic lesions (mostly adenomatous polyps) were detected in 23.5% of screened subjects. There were large differences among gastroenterologists in the rates of detection of adenomas (range of the mean number of lesions per subject screened, 0.10 to 1.05; range of the percentage of subjects with adenomas, 9.4 to 32.7%) and in their times of withdrawal of the colonoscope from the cecum to the anus (range, 3.1 to 16.8 minutes for procedures during which no polyps were removed). As compared with colonoscopists with mean withdrawal times of less than 6 minutes, those with mean withdrawal times of 6 minutes or more had higher rates of detection of any neoplasia (28.3% vs. 11.8%, P<0.001) and of advanced neoplasia (6.4% vs. 2.6%, P=0.005).

Conclusions In this large community-based gastroenterology practice, we observed greater rates of detection of adenomas among endoscopists who had longer mean times for withdrawal of the colonoscope. The effect of variation in withdrawal times on lesion detection and the prevention of colorectal cancer in the context of widespread colonoscopic screening is not known. Ours was a preliminary study, so the generalizability and implications for clinical practice need to be determined by future studies.

Source Information

From Rockford Gastroenterology Associates (R.L.B., J.J.V., J.F.J., R.L.G.) and the University of Illinois College of Medicine at Rockford (R.L.B., J.J.V., A.S.D., J.F.J., R.L.G.) — both in Rockford.

Address reprint requests to Dr. Barclay at Rockford Gastroenterology Associates, 401 Roxbury Rd., Rockford, IL 61107, or at drbarclay{at}rockfordgi.com.

Full Text of this Article

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Van Gossum, A., Munoz-Navas, M., Fernandez-Urien, I., Carretero, C., Gay, G., Delvaux, M., Lapalus, M. G., Ponchon, T., Neuhaus, H., Philipper, M., Costamagna, G., Riccioni, M. E., Spada, C., Petruzziello, L., Fraser, C., Postgate, A., Fitzpatrick, A., Hagenmuller, F., Keuchel, M., Schoofs, N., Deviere, J. (2009). Capsule Endoscopy versus Colonoscopy for the Detection of Polyps and Cancer. NEJM 361: 264-270 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Matsuda, T., Fujii, T., Sano, Y., Kudo, S.-e., Oda, Y., Igarashi, M., Iishi, H., Murakami, Y., Ishikawa, H., Shimoda, T., Kaneko, K., Yoshida, S. (2009). Five-year Incidence of Advanced Neoplasia after Initial Colonoscopy in Japan: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study. Jpn J Clin Oncol 39: 435-442 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Pickhardt, P. J., Kim, D. H. (2009). Colorectal Cancer Screening With CT Colonography: Key Concepts Regarding Polyp Prevalence, Size, Histology, Morphology, and Natural History. Am. J. Roentgenol. 193: 40-46 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Murray, J. (2009). Food For Thought: Self-Criticism and Raising the Bar of Dysphagia Practice. Swallowing and Swallowing Disorders (Dysphagia) 18: 68-77 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Roy, H. K., Turzhitsky, V., Kim, Y., Goldberg, M. J., Watson, P., Rogers, J. D., Gomes, A. J., Kromine, A., Brand, R. E., Jameel, M., Bogovejic, A., Pradhan, P., Backman, V. (2009). Association between Rectal Optical Signatures and Colonic Neoplasia: Potential Applications for Screening. Cancer Res. 69: 4476-4483 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Gomes, A. J., Roy, H. K., Turzhitsky, V., Kim, Y., Rogers, J. D., Ruderman, S., Stoyneva, V., Goldberg, M. J., Bianchi, L. K., Yen, E., Kromine, A., Jameel, M., Backman, V. (2009). Rectal Mucosal Microvascular Blood Supply Increase Is Associated with Colonic Neoplasia. Clin. Cancer Res. 15: 3110-3117 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Hundt, S., Haug, U., Brenner, H. (2009). Comparative Evaluation of Immunochemical Fecal Occult Blood Tests for Colorectal Adenoma Detection. ANN INTERN MED 150: 162-169 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Regge, D., Hassan, C., Pickhardt, P. J., Laghi, A., Zullo, A., Kim, D. H., Iafrate, F., Morini, S. (2009). Impact of Computer-aided Detection on the Cost-effectiveness of CT Colonography. Radiology 250: 488-497 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Baxter, N. N., Goldwasser, M. A., Paszat, L. F., Saskin, R., Urbach, D. R., Rabeneck, L. (2009). Association of Colonoscopy and Death From Colorectal Cancer. ANN INTERN MED 150: 1-8 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Wilkins, T., LeClair, B., Smolkin, M., Davies, K., Thomas, A., Taylor, M. L., Strayer, S. (2009). Screening Colonoscopies by Primary Care Physicians: A Meta-Analysis. Ann Fam Med 7: 56-62 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Pohl, J, Lotterer, E, Balzer, C, Sackmann, M, Schmidt, K-D, Gossner, L, Schaab, C, Frieling, T, Medve, M, Mayer, G, Nguyen-Tat, M, Ell, C (2009). Computed virtual chromoendoscopy versus standard colonoscopy with targeted indigocarmine chromoscopy: a randomised multicentre trial. Gut 58: 73-78 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Stoffel, E. M., Turgeon, D. K., Stockwell, D. H., Normolle, D. P., Tuck, M. K., Marcon, N. E., Baron, J. A., Bresalier, R. S., Arber, N., Ruffin, M. T., Syngal, S., Brenner, D. E., for Great Lakes New England Clinical Epidemiology, (2008). Chromoendoscopy Detects More Adenomas than Colonoscopy Using Intensive Inspection without Dye Spraying. Cancer Prevention Research 1: 507-513 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Zauber, A. G., Lansdorp-Vogelaar, I., Knudsen, A. B., Wilschut, J., van Ballegooijen, M., Kuntz, K. M. (2008). Evaluating Test Strategies for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Decision Analysis for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. ANN INTERN MED 149: 659-669 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Kaltenbach, T, Friedland, S, Soetikno, R (2008). A randomised tandem colonoscopy trial of narrow band imaging versus white light examination to compare neoplasia miss rates. Gut 57: 1406-1412 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Rex, D. K., Winawer, S. J. (2008). Should We Shorten or Lengthen Postpolypectomy Surveillance Intervals?. ANN INTERN MED 149: 360-360 [Full Text]  
• Lance, P. (2008). Colorectal Cancer Screening: Confusion Reigns. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 17: 2205-2207 [Full Text]  
• Sung, J J Y, Lau, J Y W, Young, G P, Sano, Y, Chiu, H M, Byeon, J S, Yeoh, K G, Goh, K L, Sollano, J, Rerknimitr, R, Matsuda, T, Wu, K C, Ng, S, Leung, S Y, Makharia, G, Chong, V H, Ho, K Y, Brooks, D, Lieberman, D A, Chan, F K L, for The Asia Pacific Working Group on Colorectal C, (2008). Asia Pacific consensus recommendations for colorectal cancer screening. Gut 57: 1166-1176 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• BIANCHI, L. K., BURKE, C. A. (2008). Understanding current guidelines for colorectal cancer screening: A case-based approach. Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine 75: 441-448 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Galmiche, J P, Coron, E, Sacher-Huvelin, S (2008). Recent developments in capsule endoscopy. Gut 57: 695-703 [Full Text]  
• Roy, H. K., Bianchi, L. K. (2008). Purging the Colon While Preserving the Kidneys. Arch Intern Med 168: 565-567 [Full Text]  
• Lieberman, D. (2008). Nonpolypoid Colorectal Neoplasia in the United States: The Parachute Is Open. JAMA 299: 1068-1069 [Full Text]  
• Lee, P., Blumberg, D. M. (2008). Understanding the Critical Importance of Diagnosis in the Measurement of Quality of Care. Arch Ophthalmol 126: 426-427 [Full Text]  
• East, J E, Suzuki, N, Stavrinidis, M, Guenther, T, Thomas, H J W, Saunders, B P (2008). Narrow band imaging for colonoscopic surveillance in hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer. Gut 57: 65-70 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Adler, A, Pohl, H, Papanikolaou, I S, Abou-Rebyeh, H, Schachschal, G, Veltzke-Schlieker, W, Khalifa, A C, Setka, E, Koch, M, Wiedenmann, B, Rosch, T (2008). A prospective randomised study on narrow-band imaging versus conventional colonoscopy for adenoma detection: does narrow-band imaging induce a learning effect?. Gut 57: 59-64 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Kim, D. H., Pickhardt, P. J., Taylor, A. J., Leung, W. K., Winter, T. C., Hinshaw, J. L., Gopal, D. V., Reichelderfer, M., Hsu, R. H., Pfau, P. R. (2007). CT Colonography versus Colonoscopy for the Detection of Advanced Neoplasia. NEJM 357: 1403-1412 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Bodenheimer, T., Berenson, R. A., Rudolf, P. (2007). The Primary Care-Specialty Income Gap. ANN INTERN MED 146: 896-896 [Full Text]  
• Rex, D. K. (2007). Colonoscopy: The Dominant and Preferred Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategy in the United States. Mayo Clin Proc. 82: 662-664 [Full Text]  
• Gupta, S., Rockey, D. C., Shen, B., Barclay, R. L., Vicari, J. J., Greenlaw, R. L. (2007). Colonoscopic Withdrawal Times and Adenoma Detection. NEJM 356: 1174-1174 [Full Text]  
• (2007). JournalScan. Gut 56: 416-416 [Full Text]  
• Latreille, M. W., Anderson, J. C., Maisonneuve, P., Lowenfels, A. B., Picca, S. M., Regula, J., Polkowski, M., Butruk, E. (2007). Colonoscopy Screening for Detection of Advanced Neoplasia. NEJM 356: 632-634 [Full Text]  
• (2007). Adenoma Detection Rates Vary Substantially. JWatch Gastroenterology 2007: 1-1 [Full Text]  
• Levine, J. S., Ahnen, D. J. (2006). Adenomatous Polyps of the Colon. NEJM 355: 2551-2557 [Full Text]  
• Lieberman, D. (2006). A Call to Action -- Measuring the Quality of Colonoscopy. NEJM 355: 2588-2589 [Full Text]