The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Correspondence
PreviousPrevious
Volume 355:956-958 August 31, 2006 Number 9
NextNext

Catheters and the Treatment of Acute Lung Injury

Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-PDA Full Text
-Purchase this article

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited
-E-mail When Letters Appear

More Information
-Related Article
 by Shure, D.
-Related Article
 by The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Clinical Trials Network
-PubMed Citation
To the Editor: The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Clinical Trials Network reports an increased incidence of arrhythmias among patients who received a pulmonary-artery catheter (PAC), as compared with a central venous catheter (CVC) (May 25 issue).1 The authors attribute this difference to the arrhythmogenic effects of the PAC and its insertion. In Table 1 of the article, they report that vasopressor use was 36 percent in the PAC group, as compared with 30 percent in the CVC group. The difference was significant. It is well known that vasopressors can cause both atrial and . . . [Full Text of this Article]


This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.