|
|
|||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
For reasons not entirely clear, medical historians writing in the first half of the 20th century seemed driven to write sweeping histories, describing developments from antiquity to their own time. The fact-filled tomes of Fielding Garrison (1913), William Osler (1921), Charles Singer (1928), Victor Robinson (1931), Arturo Castiglione (1936), Richard Shryock (1936), Kenneth Walker (1953), and Erwin H. Ackerknecht (1955) continue to sit on our shelves, but few of them are read, or even recommended, today. The past 45 years or so, by contrast, could be called the age of the monograph, launched symbolically by the appearance of Charles Rosenberg's
HOME | SUBSCRIBE | SEARCH | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | COLLECTIONS | PRIVACY | HELP | beta.nejm.org Comments and questions? Please contact us. The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved. |