FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |   Search Term  Advanced Search

Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe

Previous Volume 356:1998-1999 May 10, 2007 Number 19 Next

	Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

	Full Text PDF PDA Full Text Add to Personal Archive Add to Citation Manager Notify a Friend E-mail When Cited E-mail When Letters Appear Related Article by Baden, L. R. PubMed Citation

To the Editor: Those who oppose mandating vaccination against human papillomavirus (HPV) as a condition for school entry generally open the debate with two fundamental questions. First, how can the government interfere in the medical decisions parents make for their children by compelling immunizations for school entry? Second, how can the HPV vaccine be a good candidate for school mandates when HPV infection is transmitted only through intimate contact, not through casual encounters, as with other diseases that are preventable with vaccines? In fact, requiring vaccination against HPV for school entry is firmly rooted in American jurisprudence.

The Supreme Court, . . . [Full Text of this Article]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Stange, K. C. (2007). In This Issue: Clinical Diagnosis and Management. Ann Fam Med 5: 290-291 [Full Text]  
• Baden, L. R., Curfman, G. D., Morrissey, S., Drazen, J. M. (2007). Human Papillomavirus Vaccine -- Opportunity and Challenge. NEJM 356: 1990-1991 [Full Text]