Surgical versus Nonsurgical Treatment for Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
James N. Weinstein, D.O., Jon D. Lurie, M.D., Tor D. Tosteson, Sc.D., Brett Hanscom, M.S., Anna N.A. Tosteson, Sc.D., Emily A. Blood, M.S., Nancy J.O. Birkmeyer, Ph.D., Alan S. Hilibrand, M.D., Harry Herkowitz, M.D., Frank P. Cammisa, M.D., Todd J. Albert, M.D., Sanford E. Emery, M.D., M.B.A., Lawrence G. Lenke, M.D., William A. Abdu, M.D., Michael Longley, M.D., Thomas J. Errico, M.D., and Serena S. Hu, M.D.
Background Management of degenerative spondylolisthesis withspinal stenosis is controversial. Surgery is widely used, butits effectiveness in comparison with that of nonsurgical treatmenthas not been demonstrated in controlled trials.
Methods Surgical candidates from 13 centers in 11 U.S. stateswho had at least 12 weeks of symptoms and image-confirmed degenerativespondylolisthesis were offered enrollment in a randomized cohortor an observational cohort. Treatment was standard decompressivelaminectomy (with or without fusion) or usual nonsurgical care.The primary outcome measures were the Medical Outcomes Study36-Item Short-Form General Health Survey (SF-36) bodily painand physical function scores (100-point scales, with higherscores indicating less severe symptoms) and the modified OswestryDisability Index (100-point scale, with lower scores indicatingless severe symptoms) at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year,and 2 years.
Results We enrolled 304 patients in the randomized cohort and303 in the observational cohort. The baseline characteristicsof the two cohorts were similar. The one-year crossover rateswere high in the randomized cohort (approximately 40% in eachdirection) but moderate in the observational cohort (17% crossoverto surgery and 3% crossover to nonsurgical care). The intention-to-treatanalysis for the randomized cohort showed no statistically significanteffects for the primary outcomes. The as-treated analysis forboth cohorts combined showed a significant advantage for surgeryat 3 months that increased at 1 year and diminished only slightlyat 2 years. The treatment effects at 2 years were 18.1 for bodilypain (95% confidence interval [CI], 14.5 to 21.7), 18.3 forphysical function (95% CI, 14.6 to 21.9), and 16.7 forthe Oswestry Disability Index (95% CI, 19.5 to 13.9).There was little evidence of harm from either treatment.
Conclusions In nonrandomized as-treated comparisons with carefulcontrol for potentially confounding baseline factors, patientswith degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis treatedsurgically showed substantially greater improvement in painand function during a period of 2 years than patients treatednonsurgically. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00000409
[ClinicalTrials.gov]
.)
Source Information
From the Departments of Orthopaedics (J.N.W., B.H., E.A.B., W.A.A.), Medicine (J.D.L., A.N.A.T.), and Community and Family Medicine (J.N.W., T.D.T., A.N.A.T.), Dartmouth Medical School, Lebanon, NH; the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (N.J.O.B.); the Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia (A.S.H., T.J.A.); William H. Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI (H.H.); the Hospital for Special Surgery, New York (F.P.C.); the University Hospitals of Cleveland and Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland (S.E.E.); Washington University, St. Louis (L.G.L.); the Nebraska Foundation for Spinal Research, Omaha (M.L.); the Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York (T.J.E.); and the University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco (S.S.H.).
Address reprint requests to Dr. Weinstein at SPORT{at}dartmouth.edu.
Rihn, J. A., Berven, S., Allen, T., Phillips, F. M., Currier, B. L., Glassman, S. D., Nash, D. B., Mick, C., Crockard, A., Albert, T. J.
(2009). Defining Value in Spine Care. American Journal of Medical Quality
24: 4S-14S
[Abstract]
Allen, R. T., Rihn, J. A., Glassman, S. D., Currier, B., Albert, T. J., Phillips, F. M.
(2009). An Evidence-Based Approach to Spine Surgery. American Journal of Medical Quality
24: 15S-24S
[Abstract]
Baras, J. D., Baker, L. C.
(2009). Magnetic Resonance Imaging And Low Back Pain Care For Medicare Patients. Health Aff (Millwood)
28: w1133-w1140
[Abstract][Full Text]
Weinstein, J. N., Lurie, J. D., Tosteson, T. D., Zhao, W., Blood, E. A., Tosteson, A. N.A., Birkmeyer, N., Herkowitz, H., Longley, M., Lenke, L., Emery, S., Hu, S. S.
(2009). Surgical Compared with Nonoperative Treatment for Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis. Four-Year Results in the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) Randomized and Observational Cohorts. JBJS
91: 1295-1304
[Abstract][Full Text]
Tosteson, A. N.A., Lurie, J. D., Tosteson, T. D., Skinner, J. S., Herkowitz, H., Albert, T., Boden, S. D., Bridwell, K., Longley, M., Andersson, G. B., Blood, E. A., Grove, M. R., Weinstein, J. N., for the SPORT Investigators,
(2008). Surgical Treatment of Spinal Stenosis with and without Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: Cost-Effectiveness after 2 Years. ANN INTERN MED
149: 845-853
[Abstract][Full Text]
Katz, J. N., Losina, E.
(2008). Cost-Effectiveness of Spine Surgery: The Jury Is Out. ANN INTERN MED
149: 901-903
[Full Text]
Sugioka, T., Hayashino, Y., Konno, S., Kikuchi, S., Fukuhara, S.
(2008). Predictive value of self-reported patient information for the identification of lumbar spinal stenosis. Fam Pract
25: 237-244
[Abstract][Full Text]
Bridwell, K. H., Anderson, P. A., Boden, S. D., Vaccaro, A. R., Wang, J. C.
(2008). What's New in Spine Surgery. JBJS
90: 1609-1619
[Full Text]
Hu, S. S., Tribus, C. B., Diab, M., Ghanayem, A. J.
(2008). Spondylolisthesis and Spondylolysis. JBJS
90: 656-671
[Full Text]
Weinstein, J. N., Tosteson, T. D., Lurie, J. D., Tosteson, A. N.A., Blood, E., Hanscom, B., Herkowitz, H., Cammisa, F., Albert, T., Boden, S. D., Hilibrand, A., Goldberg, H., Berven, S., An, H., the SPORT Investigators,
(2008). Surgical versus Nonsurgical Therapy for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis. NEJM
358: 794-810
[Abstract][Full Text]
Boutron, I., Moher, D., Altman, D. G., Schulz, K. F., Ravaud, P., for the CONSORT Group,
(2008). Extending the CONSORT Statement to Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatment: Explanation and Elaboration. ANN INTERN MED
148: 295-309
[Abstract][Full Text]
(2007). . JAOA: Journal of the American Osteopathic Association
107: 519-521
[Full Text]
Hilibrand, A. S., Spindler, K. P., Boden, S. D.
(2007). AOA Symposium. Orthopaedists Partnering with Other Physicians to Provide Musculoskeletal Care. JBJS
89: 2810-2818
[Full Text]
Benzon, H. T.
(2007). Studies on Diagnostic Injections and Surgery for Low Back Pain: Problems, Advances, and Opportunities. Anesth. Analg.
105: 1523-1525
[Full Text]
Gibson, J N A.
(2007). Surgery for disc disease. BMJ
335: 949-949
[Full Text]
Chou, R., Qaseem, A., Snow, V., Casey, D., Cross, J. T. Jr, Shekelle, P., Owens, D. K., for the Clinical Efficacy Assessment Subcommittee,
(2007). Diagnosis and Treatment of Low Back Pain: A Joint Clinical Practice Guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Pain Society. ANN INTERN MED
147: 478-491
[Abstract][Full Text]
da Costa, B. R., Johnston, B. C., Copeland, B., Weinstein, J. N., Lurie, J. D., Tosteson, T. D., Deyo, R. A.
(2007). Surgical versus Nonsurgical Treatment for Back Pain. NEJM
357: 1255-1256
[Full Text]
(2007). Surgery for Herniated Lumbar Disc and for Spondylolisthesis. JWatch Neurology
2007: 1-1
[Full Text]
(2007). Surgery vs. Nonoperative Treatment for Back Disorders. JWatch General
2007: 1-1
[Full Text]