The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 356:227-236 January 18, 2007 Number 3
NextNext

Mammographic Density and the Risk and Detection of Breast Cancer
Norman F. Boyd, M.D., D.Sc., Helen Guo, M.Sc., Lisa J. Martin, Ph.D., Limei Sun, M.Sc., Jennifer Stone, M.Sc., Eve Fishell, M.D., F.R.C.P.C., Roberta A. Jong, M.D., F.R.C.P.C., Greg Hislop, M.D., F.R.C.P.C., Anna Chiarelli, Ph.D., Salomon Minkin, Ph.D., and Martin J. Yaffe, Ph.D.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-PDA Full Text
-PowerPoint Slide Set
-Supplementary Material

Commentary
-Editorial
 by Kerlikowske, K.
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited
-E-mail When Letters Appear

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Extensive mammographic density is associated with an increased risk of breast cancer and makes the detection of cancer by mammography difficult, but the influence of density on risk according to method of cancer detection is unknown.

Methods We carried out three nested case–control studies in screened populations with 1112 matched case–control pairs. We examined the association of the measured percentage of density in the baseline mammogram with risk of breast cancer, according to method of cancer detection, time since the initiation of screening, and age.

Results As compared with women with density in less than 10% of the mammogram, women with density in 75% or more had an increased risk of breast cancer (odds ratio, 4.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.0 to 7.4), whether detected by screening (odds ratio, 3.5; 95% CI, 2.0 to 6.2) or less than 12 months after a negative screening examination (odds ratio, 17.8; 95% CI, 4.8 to 65.9). Increased risk of breast cancer, whether detected by screening or other means, persisted for at least 8 years after study entry and was greater in younger than in older women. For women younger than the median age of 56 years, 26% of all breast cancers and 50% of cancers detected less than 12 months after a negative screening test were attributable to density in 50% or more of the mammogram.

Conclusions Extensive mammographic density is strongly associated with the risk of breast cancer detected by screening or between screening tests. A substantial fraction of breast cancers can be attributed to this risk factor.


Source Information

From the Campbell Family Institute for Breast Cancer Research (N.F.B., H.G., L.J.M., L.S.); the Ontario Cancer Institute (N.F.B, H.G., L.J.M., L.S., J.S., S.M.); the Departments of Radiology and Imaging Research, Women's College Hospital (E.F.) and Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre (R.A.J., M.J.Y.); and the Ontario Breast Screening Program, Cancer Care Ontario (A.C.) — all in Toronto; and the British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver (G.H.) — all in Canada.

Address reprint requests to Dr. Boyd at Ontario Cancer Institute, 610 University Ave., Room 10-415, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada, or at boyd{at}uhnres.utoronto.ca.

Full Text of this Article


Related Letters:

Mammographic Breast Density
Dandolu V., Hernandez E., Kopans D. B., Cuzick J., van Netten J. P., van Netten-Thomas C. J., Fletcher C. L., Boyd N., Minkin S., Yaffe M.
Extract | Full Text | PDF  
N Engl J Med 2007; 356:1885-1887, May 3, 2007. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2010 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.