The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Editorial
PreviousPrevious
Volume 356:414-415 January 25, 2007 Number 4
NextNext

Assessing Doctors at Work — Progress and Challenges
Daniel Klass, M.D., C.M.

Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-PDA Full Text

Commentary
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited
-E-mail When Letters Appear

More Information
-Related Article
 by Epstein, R. M.
-PubMed Citation
A fair amount of scrutiny has been given recently to the assessment of medical students' competence before they enter practice. In this issue of the Journal, Epstein provides a timely summary of advances in this arena.1 In contrast, little attention has been paid to the assessment of doctors who are already in practice. As Epstein points out, far from being a fixed attribute or trait, competence comprises multidimensional sets of behaviors that are dependent on both environmental and individual factors.2,3,4 As a result, the assessment of competence must go beyond the identification of who practitioners are, on the basis of . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Source Information

From the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario and the Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto.


Related Letters:

Assessment in Medical Education
Parakh K., de Galan B. E., van Gurp P. J., Stuyt P. M., Buttery C. M., Cassel C. K., Epstein R., Klass D.
Extract | Full Text | PDF  
N Engl J Med 2007; 356:2108-2110, May 17, 2007. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.