The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Correspondence
PreviousPrevious
Volume 358:428-431 January 24, 2008 Number 4
NextNext

An Appraisal of "Chronic Lyme Disease"

Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-PDA Full Text

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited
-E-mail When Letters Appear

More Information
-Related Article
 by Feder, H. M.
-PubMed Citation
To the Editor: Feder et al. (Oct. 4 issue)1 review the great controversy surrounding "chronic Lyme disease." For most patients with this diagnosis, the authors advocate against the use of antibiotics.

But before the decision is made not to use antibiotics for patients with post–tick-bite symptoms, anaplasma, babesia, bartonella,2 and ehrlichia must be ruled out. These tick-borne2 intracellular pathogens are difficult to diagnose and can establish long-term, persistent infection.3,4,5 Anaplasma, babesia, and bartonella are underdiagnosed: the nonspecific symptoms of infections with these organisms tend to be ascribed to the more easily identifiable Lyme disease, which often accompanies them.2,3,4,5,6 Indeed, when . . . [Full Text of this Article]




HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.