The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 358:877-887 February 28, 2008 Number 9
NextNext

Vasopressin versus Norepinephrine Infusion in Patients with Septic Shock
James A. Russell, M.D., Keith R. Walley, M.D., Joel Singer, Ph.D., Anthony C. Gordon, M.B., B.S., M.D., Paul C. Hébert, M.D., D. James Cooper, B.M., B.S., M.D., Cheryl L. Holmes, M.D., Sangeeta Mehta, M.D., John T. Granton, M.D., Michelle M. Storms, B.Sc.N., Deborah J. Cook, M.D., Jeffrey J. Presneill, M.B., B.S., Ph.D., Dieter Ayers, M.Sc., for the VASST Investigators

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-PDA Full Text
-PowerPoint Slide Set
-CME Exam
-Supplementary Material

Commentary
-Editorial
 by Parrillo, J. E.
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited
-E-mail When Letters Appear

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Vasopressin is commonly used as an adjunct to catecholamines to support blood pressure in refractory septic shock, but its effect on mortality is unknown. We hypothesized that low-dose vasopressin as compared with norepinephrine would decrease mortality among patients with septic shock who were being treated with conventional (catecholamine) vasopressors.

Methods In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial, we assigned patients who had septic shock and were receiving a minimum of 5 µg of norepinephrine per minute to receive either low-dose vasopressin (0.01 to 0.03 U per minute) or norepinephrine (5 to 15 µg per minute) in addition to open-label vasopressors. All vasopressor infusions were titrated and tapered according to protocols to maintain a target blood pressure. The primary end point was the mortality rate 28 days after the start of infusions.

Results A total of 778 patients underwent randomization, were infused with the study drug (396 patients received vasopressin, and 382 norepinephrine), and were included in the analysis. There was no significant difference between the vasopressin and norepinephrine groups in the 28-day mortality rate (35.4% and 39.3%, respectively; P=0.26) or in 90-day mortality (43.9% and 49.6%, respectively; P=0.11). There were no significant differences in the overall rates of serious adverse events (10.3% and 10.5%, respectively; P=1.00). In the prospectively defined stratum of less severe septic shock, the mortality rate was lower in the vasopressin group than in the norepinephrine group at 28 days (26.5% vs. 35.7%, P=0.05); in the stratum of more severe septic shock, there was no significant difference in 28-day mortality (44.0% and 42.5%, respectively; P=0.76). A test for heterogeneity between these two study strata was not significant (P=0.10).

Conclusions Low-dose vasopressin did not reduce mortality rates as compared with norepinephrine among patients with septic shock who were treated with catecholamine vasopressors. (Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN94845869 [controlled-trials.com] .)


Source Information

From the iCAPTURE Centre, Vancouver, BC (J.A.R., K.R.W., A.C.G., M.M.S.); St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC (J.A.R., K.R.W., J.S., A.C.G., M.M.S., D.A.); Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa (P.C.H.); Kelowna General Hospital, Kelowna, BC, and University of British Columbia, Vancouver (C.L.H.); Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto (S.M.); Toronto General Hospital, Toronto Western Hospital, and University of Toronto, Toronto (J.T.G.); and St. Joseph's Hospital and McMaster University, Hamilton, ON (D.J. Cook) — all in Canada; and Alfred Hospital and Monash University, Melbourne (D.J. Cooper); and Royal Melbourne Hospital and University of Melbourne (J.J.P.) — all in Melbourne, Australia.

Address reprint requests to Dr. Russell at Critical Care Medicine, St. Paul's Hospital, 1081 Burrard St., Vancouver, BC V6Z 1Y6, Canada, or at jrussell{at}mrl.ubc.ca.

Full Text of this Article


Related Letters:

Vasopressin in Septic Shock
Boyle W. A., Leone M., Dünser M. W., Hasibeder W. R., Wenzel V., Landry D. W., Oliver J. A., Mogyorosi A., Russell J. A., Walley K. R.
Extract | Full Text | PDF  
N Engl J Med 2008; 358:2736-2738, Jun 19, 2008. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.