In May 2006, the American Psychiatric Association (APA) adopteda position statement prohibiting psychiatrists from "directparticipation" in the interrogation of any person in militaryor civilian detention — including "being present in theinterrogation room, asking or suggesting questions, or advisingauthorities on the use of specific techniques of interrogationwith particular detainees."1 A few weeks later, the Councilon Ethical and Judicial Affairs of the American Medical Association(AMA) issued a similar opinion, stating that "physicians mustneither conduct nor directly participate in an interrogation,because a role as physician–interrogator undermines thephysician's role as healer."2 The opinion . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Source Information
Mr. Marks is an associate professor of bioethics, humanities, and law at the Pennsylvania State University at University Park and at the College of Medicine in Hershey, and a barrister and academic member of Matrix Chambers, London. Dr. Bloche is a professor of law at Georgetown University and a Nonresident Senior Fellow at the Brookings Institution, Washington, DC, and an adjunct professor at the Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore.
Stotland, N. L., Heyman, J. M.
(2008). Military Medical Ethics. NEJM
359: 2728-2729
[Full Text]
Speers, R. D., Brands, W. G., Nuzzolese, E., Smith, D., Swiss, P. B.F., van Woensel, M., Welie, J. V.M.
(2008). Preventing dentists' involvement in torture: The developmental history of a new international declaration. Journal of the American Dental Association
139: 1667-1673
[Abstract][Full Text]