|
|
|||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In the 1970s and 1980s, the first wave of disability theorists began to criticize medical professionals and bioethicists for using a medical model of disability. They argued that those who subscribed to the medical model were wrong to assume that, as deviations from normal function, physical impairments are intrinsically bad. And they argued that those who used the medical model literally did not know what they were talking about. This ignorance was due not only to a failure of imagination but also to a failure to listen to people with disabilities. Why bother? It seemed self-evident that impairments necessarily entailed
HOME | SUBSCRIBE | SEARCH | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | COLLECTIONS | PRIVACY | TERMS OF USE | HELP | beta.nejm.org Comments and questions? Please contact us. The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved. |