The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 359:2417-2428 December 4, 2008 Number 23
NextNext

Benazepril plus Amlodipine or Hydrochlorothiazide for Hypertension in High-Risk Patients
Kenneth Jamerson, M.D., Michael A. Weber, M.D., George L. Bakris, M.D., Björn Dahlöf, M.D., Bertram Pitt, M.D., Victor Shi, M.D., Allen Hester, Ph.D., Jitendra Gupte, M.S., Marjorie Gatlin, M.D., Eric J. Velazquez, M.D., for the ACCOMPLISH Trial Investigators

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-PDA Full Text
-PowerPoint Slide Set
-CME Exam

Commentary
-Editorial
 by Chobanian, A. V.
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited
-E-mail When Letters Appear

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background The optimal combination drug therapy for hypertension is not established, although current U.S. guidelines recommend inclusion of a diuretic. We hypothesized that treatment with the combination of an angiotensin-converting–enzyme (ACE) inhibitor and a dihydropyridine calcium-channel blocker would be more effective in reducing the rate of cardiovascular events than treatment with an ACE inhibitor plus a thiazide diuretic.

Methods In a randomized, double-blind trial, we assigned 11,506 patients with hypertension who were at high risk for cardiovascular events to receive treatment with either benazepril plus amlodipine or benazepril plus hydrochlorothiazide. The primary end point was the composite of death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, hospitalization for angina, resuscitation after sudden cardiac arrest, and coronary revascularization.

Results The baseline characteristics of the two groups were similar. The trial was terminated early after a mean follow-up of 36 months, when the boundary of the prespecified stopping rule was exceeded. Mean blood pressures after dose adjustment were 131.6/73.3 mm Hg in the benazepril–amlodipine group and 132.5/74.4 mm Hg in the benazepril–hydrochlorothiazide group. There were 552 primary-outcome events in the benazepril–amlodipine group (9.6%) and 679 in the benazepril–hydrochlorothiazide group (11.8%), representing an absolute risk reduction with benazepril–amlodipine therapy of 2.2% and a relative risk reduction of 19.6% (hazard ratio, 0.80, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72 to 0.90; P<0.001). For the secondary end point of death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and nonfatal stroke, the hazard ratio was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.67 to 0.92; P=0.002). Rates of adverse events were consistent with those observed from clinical experience with the study drugs.

Conclusions The benazepril–amlodipine combination was superior to the benazepril–hydrochlorothiazide combination in reducing cardiovascular events in patients with hypertension who were at high risk for such events. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00170950 [ClinicalTrials.gov] .)


Source Information

From the University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor (K.J., B.P.); the State University of New York Downstate Medical College, Brooklyn (M.A.W.); the University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago (G.L.B.); Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden (B.D.); Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ (V.S., A.H., J.G., M.G.); and Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (E.J.V.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Jamerson at the Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, 24 Frank Lloyd Wright Dr., Lobby M, Ann Arbor, MI 48106, or at emarshal{at}umich.edu.

Full Text of this Article


Related Letters:

Benazepril plus Amlodipine or Hydrochlorothiazide for Hypertension
Parra D., Rosenstein R., Strauss M. H., Weinstein J., Newton G. E., Davis B. R., Whelton P. K., the ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group , Jamerson K. A., Weber M. A.
Extract | Full Text | PDF  
N Engl J Med 2009; 360:1147-1150, Mar 12, 2009. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2010 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.