The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 360:1946-1959 May 7, 2009 Number 19
NextNext

Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents versus Bare-Metal Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction
Gregg W. Stone, M.D., Alexandra J. Lansky, M.D., Stuart J. Pocock, Ph.D., Bernard J. Gersh, M.B., Ch.B., D.Phil., George Dangas, M.D., Ph.D., S. Chiu Wong, M.D., Bernhard Witzenbichler, M.D., Giulio Guagliumi, M.D., Jan Z. Peruga, M.D., Bruce R. Brodie, M.D., Dariusz Dudek, M.D., Martin Möckel, M.D., Andrzej Ochala, M.D., Alison Kellock, B.S., Helen Parise, Sc.D., Roxana Mehran, M.D., for the HORIZONS-AMI Trial Investigators

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-PDA Full Text
-PowerPoint Slide Set
-Supplementary Material

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited
-E-mail When Letters Appear

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background There is no consensus regarding the safety and efficacy of drug-eluting stents, as compared with bare-metal stents, in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who are undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Methods We randomly assigned, in a 3:1 ratio, 3006 patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction to receive paclitaxel-eluting stents (2257 patients) or otherwise identical bare-metal stents (749 patients). The two primary end points of the study were the 12-month rates of target-lesion revascularization for ischemia (analysis powered for superiority) and a composite safety outcome measure of death, reinfarction, stroke, or stent thrombosis (powered for noninferiority with a 3.0% margin). The major secondary end point was angiographic evidence of restenosis at 13 months.

Results Patients who received paclitaxel-eluting stents, as compared with those who received bare-metal stents, had significantly lower 12-month rates of ischemia-driven target-lesion revascularization (4.5% vs. 7.5%; hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.43 to 0.83; P=0.002) and target-vessel revascularization (5.8% vs. 8.7%; hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.89; P=0.006), with noninferior rates of the composite safety end point (8.1% vs. 8.0%; hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.36; absolute difference, 0.1 percentage point; 95% CI, –2.1 to 2.4; P=0.01 for noninferiority; P=0.92 for superiority). Patients treated with paclitaxel-eluting stents and those treated with bare-metal stents had similar 12-month rates of death (3.5% and 3.5%, respectively; P=0.98) and stent thrombosis (3.2% and 3.4%, respectively; P=0.77). The 13-month rate of binary restenosis was significantly lower with paclitaxel-eluting stents than with bare-metal stents (10.0% vs. 22.9%; hazard ratio, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.57; P<0.001).

Conclusions In patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who were undergoing primary PCI, implantation of paclitaxel-eluting stents, as compared with bare-metal stents, significantly reduced angiographic evidence of restenosis and recurrent ischemia necessitating repeat revascularization procedures. No safety concerns were apparent at 1 year. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00433966 [ClinicalTrials.gov] .)


Source Information

From Columbia University Medical Center and New York–Presbyterian Hospital and the Cardiovascular Research Foundation (G.W.S., A.J.L., G.D., A.K., H.P., R.M.), and New York–Presbyterian Hospital and Weill Cornell Medical Center (S.C.W.) — all in New York; London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London (S.J.P.); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (B.J.G.); Charité Campus Benjamin Franklin (B.W.) and Charité Campus Virchow-Klinikum (M.M.) — both in Berlin; Ospedali Riuniti di Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy (G.G.); Medical University, Lodz (J.Z.P.), Jagiellonian University, Krakow (D.D.), and Silesian Medical Academy, Katowice (A.O.) — all in Poland; and LeBauer Cardiovascular Research Foundation and Moses Cone Hospital, Greensboro, NC (B.R.B.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Stone at Columbia University Medical Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, 111 E. 59th St., 11th Fl., New York, NY 10022, or at gs2184{at}columbia.edu.

Full Text of this Article


This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2010 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.