FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |   Search Term  Advanced Search

Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe

Previous Volume 361:1827-1837 November 5, 2009 Number 19 Next

	Full Text PDF PDA Full Text PowerPoint Slide Set CME Exam Supplementary Material Purchase this article Editorial by Peterson, E. D. Add to Personal Archive Add to Citation Manager Notify a Friend E-mail When Cited E-mail When Letters Appear PubMed Citation

ABSTRACT

Background Coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) has traditionally been performed with the use of cardiopulmonary bypass (on-pump CABG). CABG without cardiopulmonary bypass (off-pump CABG) might reduce the number of complications related to the heart–lung machine.

Methods We randomly assigned 2203 patients scheduled for urgent or elective CABG to either on-pump or off-pump procedures. The primary short-term end point was a composite of death or complications (reoperation, new mechanical support, cardiac arrest, coma, stroke, or renal failure) before discharge or within 30 days after surgery. The primary long-term end point was a composite of death from any cause, a repeat revascularization procedure, or a nonfatal myocardial infarction within 1 year after surgery. Secondary end points included the completeness of revascularization, graft patency at 1 year, neuropsychological outcomes, and the use of major resources.

Results There was no significant difference between off-pump and on-pump CABG in the rate of the 30-day composite outcome (7.0% and 5.6%, respectively; P=0.19). The rate of the 1-year composite outcome was higher for off-pump than for on-pump CABG (9.9% vs. 7.4%, P=0.04). The proportion of patients with fewer grafts completed than originally planned was higher with off-pump CABG than with on-pump CABG (17.8% vs. 11.1%, P<0.001). Follow-up angiograms in 1371 patients who underwent 4093 grafts revealed that the overall rate of graft patency was lower in the off-pump group than in the on-pump group (82.6% vs. 87.8%, P<0.01). There were no treatment-based differences in neuropsychological outcomes or short-term use of major resources.

Conclusions At 1 year of follow-up, patients in the off-pump group had worse composite outcomes and poorer graft patency than did patients in the on-pump group. No significant differences between the techniques were found in neuropsychological outcomes or use of major resources. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00032630 [ClinicalTrials.gov] .)

Source Information

From the Northport Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Center, Northport, NY (A.L.S.); the Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Department of Veterans Affairs (A.L.S., F.L.G., B.H., J.H.B.), and National Jewish Health (E.K.) — both in Denver; the Departments of Surgery (F.L.G.) and Medicine (B.H., E.K.), School of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora; the Cooperative Studies Program Coordinating Center, VA Medical Center, Perry Point, MD (J.F.C.); the Department of Veterans Affairs, Office of Patient Care Services, Washington, DC (G.O.M.); the Charles George VA Medical Center, Asheville, NC (J.C.L.); and the James A. Haley Veterans Hospital and the Department of Surgery, University of South Florida — both in Tampa (D.N.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Collins at the Cooperative Studies Program Coordinating Center (CSPCC 151E), Boiler House Rd., Bldg. 362T, Perry Point, MD 21902, or at joseph.collins2{at}va.gov.

Full Text of this Article

This article has been cited by other articles:

• (2009). All you need to read in the other general journals. BMJ 339: b4610-b4610 [Full Text]  
• Peterson, E. D. (2009). Innovation and Comparative-Effectiveness Research in Cardiac Surgery. NEJM 361: 1897-1899 [Full Text]  
• (2009). Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: On Pump or Off Pump?. Journal Watch Cardiology 2009: 1-1 [Full Text]