FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |   Search Term  Advanced Search

Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe

Published at www.nejm.org November 15, 2009 (10.1056/NEJMe0909522)

	Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

	Full Text PDF Disclosures Purchase this article Add to Personal Archive Add to Citation Manager Notify a Friend E-mail When Cited PubMed Citation

In this issue of the Journal, Yu et al. report results of the Pacing to Avoid Cardiac Enlargement (PACE) study, a prospective, double-blind, multicenter trial designed to determine whether biventricular pacing is superior to right ventricular apical pacing for the prevention of adverse changes in left ventricular function.¹ The inclusion criteria focused on patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction of 45% or more who required pacing because of high-grade atrioventricular block or sinus-node dysfunction. The investigators observed significant differences in the primary end points of left ventricular ejection fraction and left ventricular end-systolic volume. During a follow-up period that . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Source Information

From the Cardiac Electrophysiology and Pacing Section, Department of Cardiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland.

This article (10.1056/NEJMe0909522) was published on November 15, 2009, at NEJM.org.

HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org Comments and questions? Please contact us. The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2010 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.