The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 357:28-38 July 5, 2007 Number 1
NextNext

Rosiglitazone Evaluated for Cardiovascular Outcomes — An Interim Analysis
Philip D. Home, D.M., D.Phil., Stuart J. Pocock, Ph.D., Henning Beck-Nielsen, D.M.S.C., Ramón Gomis, M.D., Ph.D., Markolf Hanefeld, M.D., Ph.D., Nigel P. Jones, M.A., Michel Komajda, M.D., John J.V. McMurray, M.D., for the RECORD Study Group

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-PDA Full Text
-PowerPoint Slide Set

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited
-E-mail When Letters Appear

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background A recent meta-analysis raised concern regarding an increased risk of myocardial infarction and death from cardiovascular causes associated with rosiglitazone treatment of type 2 diabetes.

Methods We conducted an unplanned interim analysis of a randomized, multicenter, open-label, noninferiority trial involving 4447 patients with type 2 diabetes who had inadequate glycemic control while receiving metformin or sulfonylurea, in which 2220 patients were assigned to receive add-on rosiglitazone (rosiglitazone group), and 2227 to receive a combination of metformin plus sulfonylurea (control group). The primary end point was hospitalization or death from cardiovascular causes.

Results Because the mean follow-up was only 3.75 years, our interim analysis had limited statistical power to detect treatment differences. A total of 217 patients in the rosiglitazone group and 202 patients in the control group had the adjudicated primary end point (hazard ratio, 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89 to 1.31). After the inclusion of end points pending adjudication, the hazard ratio was 1.11 (95% CI, 0.93 to 1.32). There were no statistically significant differences between the rosiglitazone group and the control group regarding myocardial infarction and death from cardiovascular causes or any cause. There were more patients with heart failure in the rosiglitazone group than in the control group (hazard ratio, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.30 to 3.57).

Conclusions Our interim findings from this ongoing study were inconclusive regarding the effect of rosiglitazone on the overall risk of hospitalization or death from cardiovascular causes. There was no evidence of any increase in death from either cardiovascular causes or all causes. Rosiglitazone was associated with an increased risk of heart failure. The data were insufficient to determine whether the drug was associated with an increase in the risk of myocardial infarction. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00379769 [ClinicalTrials.gov] .)


Source Information

From Newcastle Diabetes Centre and Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom (P.D.H.); the Medical Statistics Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London (S.J.P.); the Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark (H.B.-N.); Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona (R.G.); Zentrum für Klinische Studien Forschungsbereich Endokrinologie und Stoffwechsel, Dresden, Germany (M.H.); GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals, Harlow, United Kingdom (N.P.J.); Université Pierre et Marie Curie Paris 6 and Hôpital Pitié–Salpêtrière, Paris (M.K.); and the Department of Cardiology, University of Glasgow, Western Infirmary, Glasgow (J.J.V.M.).

This article (10.1056/NEJMoa073394) was published at www.nejm.org on June 5, 2007.

Address reprint requests to Dr. Home at SCMS-Diabetes, Medical School, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, United Kingdom, or at philip.home{at}newcastle.ac.uk.

Full Text of this Article


This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.